Eli will photograph a wedding for a flat fee of ​$1560 or for an hourly rate of ​$180. For what lengths of time would the hourly rate be less​ expensive? The hourly rate would be less expensive if the wedding was less than
? hours long.
​(Simplify your​ answer.)

The hourly rate is better between 1 and 8 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are two options

A fixed amount of $1560.

Or an hourly rate of $180 the hour.

So for the first option, the cost equation as a function of time, t, is:

f(t) = $1560

(it does not depend on t)

While for the second option, the equation would be:

g(t) = $180*t

First, we want to

We can expect that for smaller values of t the second option is better but let's see that:

or what lengths of time would the hourly rate be less​ expensive?

Then we need to solve:

f(t) = g(t)

for t, this is:

$1560 = $180*t

$1560/$180 = t = 8.66

So, for t = 8.66, the cost is the same in both options.

For t < 8.66

(between 1 and 8 hours) the second option is better. (here the hourly rate is better)

for t > 8.66

(9 hours or more) is better the first option, as the hourly (here the flat fee is better)

this is a very good question

step-by-step explanation:

i got a hair cut today from my mom not to flex just to flex kim jon un is one rad fellow i'd say you'd need to take the hairline in kinda like a box shape like someone rammed a lego brick into your head. from there you really need to take the top up keeping with that boxy aesthetic, finally coat the whole thing with gel if your country economics are failing or whatever you can just coat it with the starving children's food rations. about 5 orphans per strand is a good ratio. good luck with the fresh cut my dude

-3.5 degrees per hour

step-by-step explanation:

find the unit rate:

-12   1/4 degrees           12.25 degrees

= - = -3.5 degrees per hour

      3   1/2 hours               3.5 hours