Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly?

Ifound this on google “that means that the graph of a function with direct variation has these features: it is a straight line: because the slope is the ratio y/x = k. it passes through the origin (0,0): because y = kx = k (0) = 0.” i hope this you for what your looking for

Bruh sound effect #2

Im pretty sure it is a