Please help me on this i will give u brainliest for the best answers

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Explain why the two figures below are not similar. use complete sentences and provide evidence to support your explanation. (10 points) figure abcdef is shown. a is at negative 4, negative 2. b is at negative 3, 0. c is at negative 4, 2. d is at negative 1, 2. e

Which question is not a good survey question? a.don't you agree that the financial crisis is essentially over? 63on average, how many hours do you sleep per day? c. what is your opinion of educational funding this year? d.are you happy with the availability of electronic products in your state?