Kiran saw that if the equation (x + 2)(x - 4) = 0 is true, then, by the zero product property, either X + 2 is 0 or X - 4 is 0. He then reasoned that, if (x + 2)(x -
4) = 72 is true, then either x + 2 is equal to 72 or X-6 is equal to 72.
Explain why Kiran's conclusion is incorrect
Kiran is incorrect because the
product property only applies to products that are equal to
not ahoy product. Many pairs of factors can be multiplied to be 72. We can't be sure that one of the
factors is equal to 72

It's the zero product property. The product must be equal to zero, nothing else.

Step-by-step explanation:

If (x + 2)(x - 4) = 72, it does not mean that each factor could be equal to 72.

The number 72 has many factors (they come in pairs), and they need not even be integers, 1/2 and 144, for example.

On the other hand, if  ab = 0, then either  a = 0  or  b = 0.

don't know sorry bru

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

milk=16 large

soda=280 kids

juice box=82 regular

63 soda +63 regular

124 large total