Jury Selection A court has jurisdiction over five counties, and of the people eligible for jury duty, 14% reside in county A, 22% reside in county B, 35% reside in county C, 16% reside in county D, and 13% reside in county E. DS 10.3.4 gives the residential locations of the jurors selected over a five-year period. Is there any evidence that the jurors have not been selected at random from the eligible population?

the answer is a reflection across the line m

step-by-step explanation:

on edge

what are the statments

step-by-step explanation:

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)