A study assessed the effects of playing a computer game (solitaire) during lunch on behavioral and physiological variables. A sample of 44 healthy adults was randomly assigned to eat lunch either with the computer game distraction or without distraction. The food served for lunch was exactly the same for everyone. All participants also had the same breakfast. Thirty minutes after lunch, participants were offered cookies as a snack and were instructed to eat as many or as few cookies as they liked. Here are the summary statistics for the findings:25 Group n X Distraction 22 52.1 45.1 No distraction 22 27.1 26.4
(a) Do the findings support the hypothesis of greater snack the two-sample t statistic and P-value, and conclude
(b) Can you conclude that distraction during meals causes intake after meals taken with a distraction? State hypotheses in terms of the two population means, obtain using a significance level of 0.05 the greater snack intake? Explain your reasoning.

it is a. 4.2 because 7.6-3.4 gets the remaining length of 4.2. i might be wrong but i am pretty sure this is the answer.

there has been genes found in the x chromosome of males that have been linked to [homo/hetero]sexuality. in addition to the reign of the x chromosome, a section of chromosome 8 has also been link to, "alot of ppl are so " these facts were proven true after a 2014 study of a gay male and his strait brother. according to newscientist.com,"chromosome 14 and is mainly active in the thyroid, but also the brain. called tshr, it makes a type of receptor protein that recognises and binds to a hormone that stimulates the thyroid. in this way, the gene plays an important role in controlling thyroid function. the fact that tshr seems to be involved in sexual orientation fits with evidence that thyroid function seems to be linked to sexuality."

in conclusion, "ppl are so gay" due to their genetics.

step-by-step explanation:

d. corresponding side lengths in similar triangles are proportional in length.

step-by-step explanation: