subject
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 08:00 zoeatlowapple

A researcher is 95% confident that the interval from 3.6 hours to 8.1 hours captures μ = the true mean amount of daily screen time for US adults. Is there evidence that the true mean number of hours of screen time for US adults is greater than 3.5?

No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because there are values within the 95% confidence interval other than 3.5.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because the entire 95% confidence interval is greater than 3.5.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Find |−5|. a. −5 b. 5 c. one-fifth d. –one-fifth !
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:40
Astudent simplified a rational expression as shown.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Solve 3x-18=2y and 5x-6y=6 by elimination show work
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Factor the following expression. 27y3 – 343 a. (3y + 7)(9y2 + 2ly + 49) b. (3y – 7)(9y2 + 2ly + 49) c. (3y – 7)(932 – 217 + 49) d. (3y + 7)(92 – 2ly + 49)
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A researcher is 95% confident that the interval from 3.6 hours to 8.1 hours captures μ = the true me...
Questions
question
English, 04.02.2020 06:55
Questions on the website: 13722367