Mathematics, 24.09.2019 07:00 lbbeanss

Keith determines the zeros of the function f(x) to be -6 and 5.
what could be keith’s function?
(1) f(x) = (x + 5)(x + 6) (3) f(x) = (x - 5)(x + 6)
(2) f(x) = (x + 5)(x - 6) (4) f(x) = (x - 5)(x - 6)

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Mathematics

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:40

David estimated he had about 20 fish in his pond. a year later, there were about 1.5 times as many fish. the year after that, the number of fish increased by a factor of 1.5 again. the number of fish is modeled by f(x)=20(1.5)^x. create a question you could ask that could be answered only by graphing or using a logarithm.

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00

City l has a temperature of −3 °f. city m has a temperature of −7 °f. use the number line shown to answer the questions: number line from negative 8 to positive 8 in increments of 1 is shown. part a: write an inequality to compare the temperatures of the two cities. (3 points) part b: explain what the inequality means in relation to the positions of these numbers on the number line. (4 points) part c: use the number line to explain which city is warmer. (3 points)

Answers: 2

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:00

The table below shows the approximate masses of a dust particle and a grain of pollen. dust particle 0.000000778 g grain of pollen 0.00000000155 g the mass of a dust particle can be estimated and written in the form a × 10^b, where a = 8 and b = the mass of a grain of pollen can be estimated and written in the form a × 10^b, where a = 2 and b = based on the estimates, the mass of a dust particle is approximately blank times larger than the mass of a grain of pollen.

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:30

On a certain portion of an experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.21. what can you conclude? 2(0.21) = 0.42 < 0.5; the test is not statistically significant. if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. 0.21 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant. if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. p = 1 - 0.21 = 0.79 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Keith determines the zeros of the function f(x) to be -6 and 5.
what could be keith’s function...

Questions