Sue solved an equation incorrectly, as shown below:

step 1: 7x = 28
step 2: x = 28 − 7
step 3: x = 21

which statement best explains why step 2 is incorrect in sue's solution?

she did not multiply 28 seven times.
she did not divide 28 by 7.
she did not multiply 28 by 7.
she did not add 7 to 28.

Given: lines a and b are parallel and line c is a transversal. prove: 2 is supplementary to 8 what is the missing reason in the proof? statement reason 1. a || b, is a transv 1. given 2. ∠6 ≅ ∠2 2. ? 3. m∠6 = m∠2 3. def. of congruent 4. ∠6 is supp. to ∠8 4. def. of linear pair 5. ∠2 is supp. to ∠8 5. congruent supplements theorem corresponding angles theorem alternate interior angles theorem vertical angles theorem alternate exterior angles theorem

Yo need asap pls ! markin da brainiest too !

Which graph represents the same relation is the sa which graph represents the same relation as the set {(-3-2)}