subject
Mathematics, 11.11.2019 04:31 alexussaniyah

Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangle? the triangle is acute because 22 + 52 > 42. the triangle is acute because 2 + 4 > 5. the triangle is not acute because 22 + 42 < 52. the triangle is not acute because 22 < 42 + 52.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:40
Given the statements, "a square root of 16 is 4," and "a square root of 9 is -3," complete the following blanks with the correct truth-values. p is and q is , so the statement, "a square root of 16 is 4 or a square root of 9 is -3" is .
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:40
A. 127 cm^2 b. 144.5 cm^2 c. 172 cm^2 d. 50 cm^2
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30
Consider the input and output values for f(x) = 2x - 3 and g(x) = 2x + 7. what is a reasonable explanation for different rules with different input values producing the same sequence?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:20
Which equation can be simplified to find the inverse of y = 2x2^2
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangl...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361