Given the incomplete proof below, what is the missing reason for the statement in step 4?

ASA Congruence Theorem

Step-by-step explanation:

Already,it has been stated and proved that two angles (<ABC and <CAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABC are congruent to corresponding two angles (<ABD and <DAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABD.

Therefore, based on the ASA Congruence Theorem, ∆ABC is congruent to ∆ABD.

The missing reason is "ASA Congruence Theorem"

the answer is d

the answer is in the first quadrant, which make the y-int positive.

since the dots are going down, therefore the correlation is negative

i hope it is right.

answer:   c ?

step-by-step explanation: