A local restaurant owner can purchase T for $16 per pound and coffee for eight dollars per pound. His budget does not allow me to spend more than $280 on coffee and tea. Which graph shows the possible combinations of pounds of tea, X, and pounds of coffee, Y, that the restaurant owner can purchase?

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality

Given the numbers c = –3 and d = 4, which statement is true? a. |–c| = 3 and |–d| = –4 b. |–c| = 3 and –|d| = –4 c. –|c| = –4 and –|d| = 3 d. |–c| = 3 and –|d| = 4

Jeremy wants to determine the number of solutions for the equation below without actually solving the equation.