The correlation coefficient for blood pressure and amount of vegetables eaten in a group of people is -0.7. analyze the following statement: high blood pressure is caused by not eating vegetables. is this a reasonable conclusion?

No, because correlation does not imply causation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: The correlation coefficient for blood pressure and amount of vegetables eaten in a group of people is -0.7.

Since, correlation coefficient is negative then it must be a negative correlation which means there is inversely proportional relation between the quantities.

Thus, if blood pressure increases then amount of vegetables decreases or vice versa.

Now, the given conclusion is "High blood pressure is caused by not eating vegetables." but correlation does not imply causation .

Thus it is not a reasonable conclusion.

idk

step-by-step explanation:

use that smart brain