1) Mya and Rahim are trying to use transformations to show that AADE, shown below, is congruent to ACBE. .

Rahim says, "We can reflect AADE over a vertical line through point E, to map A onto B, D onto
C, and E onto itself. Then the triangles must be congruent." Explain why Rahim is incorrect

unless if u could do my questions, if not i wouldn't want to

answer: the distance

step-by-step explanation:

to calculate the distance d of a line segment with endpoints (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) use the formula d (x2 x1)2 (y2 y1)2. to calculate the midpoint of a line segment with endpoints (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) use the formula

wait nvm i know the correct answer now its 100%   81 square feet

~batmans wife dun dun

step-by-step explanation:

two pairs of adjacent sides are of equal length. this implies that one diagonal divides the kite into congruent triangles, and so the angles between the two pairs of equal sides are equal in measure. it also implies that the diagonals are perpendicular.