Willis analyzed the following table to determine if the function it represents is linear or non-linear. First he found the differences in the y-values as 7 - 1 = 6, 17 - 7 = 10, and 31 - 17 = 14. Then he concluded that since the differences of 6,
10. and 14 are increasing by 4 each time, the function has a constant rate of change and is linear. What was Willis's
mistake?

3. parallelogram

step-by-step explanation:

we turn each of our sides into direction vectors

ab=b-a=(3 - 7, 1 - 0) = (-4, 1)

bc=c-b=(1,6)

cd=d-c=(4,-1)

da=a-d=(-1,-6)

we see how the opposite sides have negated direction vectors; this is characteristic of a parallelogram.   we have congruent sides ab=cd and bc=da with unequal lengths because 1^2+6^2 is different from (-4)^2+1^2.   so it's not a square or a rhombus.  

we check the dot product of direction vectors of adjacent sides.   we have

ab dot bc = -4(1) + 1(6) = 2

that's not zero so the sides are not perpendicular.   we've ruled out rectangle.

the direction vectors indicate two pairs of congruent parallel sides, so we choose parallelogram over trapezoid.

45

step-by-step explanation:

f(x) is going down by 4

step-by-step explanation:

(its either that or its going left by 4)

answer: dead jah

step-by-step explanation:

bullet + jah= dead jah