Thank You to those who are helping. Please help.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

The last time i bought this product , it cost $20.00 but it looks like it cost 29. 60 today? what is the increase

1) in triangle the, what is the measure of angle t (in degrees)? 2) in triangle bat, the measure of angle b is 66∘, and the measure of angle t is 77∘.what is the measure of the exterior angle at a (in degrees)?