Inez says you can plot 40 on a number line, but Jeremiah says you cannot. Who is correct? Use the drop-down menus to explain your answer.

(Inez or Jeremiah) is correct because any number divided by zero is (undefined or equal to 0) and (can or cannot) be represented on a number line.

given that triangle abc is transformed two times to get triangle

a"b"c"

first abc is transformed in to a'b'c' as follows:

the coordinates of a are (1,-1) and transformed into a'(-1,1)

similarly b (4,-2) became b'(-4,2) and

c(7,-2) became c'(-7,2)

i.e. (x,y) becomes (-x,-y)

this is nothing but reflection about a point here origin.

thus first transformation is reflection on the origin.

next is exactly shifting 3 units down

source:

a negative exponent is translated as follows:

so, we have

29 is the correct answer

step-by-step explanation: