Is this a parallelogram if so by which theorem

Which statement most accurately describe why the division property of exponents does not apply to the expression (-8)^2/(-3)^4

Which number completes the system of linear inequalities represented by the graph? y> 2x – 2 and x + 4y 2 et 2 3 4

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality