Does any one have pad-let? I'm a girl
I'm 14
My name is Olivia
People call me Olive
I'm single
I'm looking for a boy friend...

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Create a data set with 8 points in it that has a mean of approximately 10 and a standard deviation of approximately 1.

If 25% of y is 30, what is 60% of y?