Trent is fishing from a pier. .the tip of his fishing rod is 53 3/4 feet above the surface of the water.

the hook on the end of the fishing line is directly below the fishing rod 12 2/3 feet below the surface of the water.
trent estimates that the distance between the tip of his fishing rod and hook is less than 65 feet. is trent estimate reasonable?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

10% of 1,900,000. show me how you got the answer

The function below show how much jayna and hannah charge for babysitting. which statement best compares the two plants?