Independent random samples of released prisoners in the fraud and firearms offense categories yielded the given information on time served in months. At the 1% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses? Assume that populations standard deviations are the same for both groups. (i. e., we assume σ1 = σ2 .)

Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

Fraud                                        Firearm

15.2      9.2                              20.1          15.7

11.2       15.8                             20.4          9.8

7.2         5.2                             13.1           13.5

7.7         4.9                            20.7           23.1

7.4        9.8                            10.4            22.2            

∑ 93.6                                             169                    

Fraud  (X1i)²                                      Firearm(X2j)²

231.04      84.64                           404.01          246.49

125.44      249.64                          416.16          96.04

51.84        27.04                            171.61           182.25

59.29       24.01                            428.49           533.61

54.76        96.04                            108.16           492.84

∑1003.79                                                  3079.66          

We formulate the null and alternative hypothesis as

H0: μ1 - μ2 ≤ 0 i.e. the fraud meantime is less than that for firearms offenses.

Ha: μ1-  μ2  > 0  i.e. the fraud meantime is greater than that for firearms offenses.

We set the significance level at ∝= 0.01

The test statistic, if  H0 is true , is

t=  x1`1- x`2/ Sp√1/n1+ 1/n2

which has a student t- distribution with ν= n1+ n2 -2 = 18 degrees of freedom

The critical region consists of all t- values which are greater than or equal to  t> t(0.01)(18)= 2.522

Computations :

X1`= ∑X1i/n1 = 93.6/10= 9.36

X2`=∑X2j/n2=169/10 = 16.9

∑( X1i- x`1)² = ∑X1i²- (∑X1i)²/n1

= 1003.79 - 876.096/10

= 100.379- 87.6096

=12.7694

∑( X2j- x`2)² = ∑X2j²- (∑X2j)²/n2

= 3079.66 - 28561/10

= 3079.66- 2856.1

=223.56

Sp²= 12.7694+223.56/18= 13.129

Sp = √13.129 =3.623

t= 9.36-16.9/ 3.623√0.1+0.1

t= -7.54/ 1.62

t= -4.654

Conclusion: Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

The meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

898.1666667

step-by-step explanation:

5389/6 = 898.1666667

e

step-by-step explanation:

an equation by definition has to have two or more variables (x and 2 in this case)