She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldine's statements and her conclusion? Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled. Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers. The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

is should be y = 5x

step-by-step explanation:

correct me if im wrong

proportions are fractions that equal to each other. so if two fractions are the same, they are proportional.

let's check the answers to see if they are proportional.

question a is not proportional because you can't turn 1.5/3 to 3/9. if you try to multiply 1.5/3 by 2 or 3, you wont get 3/9. it's impossible to make the fractions the same.

question b is not proportional because you can't turn 22/33 to 4/6. 33 can't go into 6.

question c is proportional because when you multiply 2 and 3 by 71, you would get 142/213, and those fractions equal to each other

question d is proportional because when you divide 14 and 7 by 2, you would end up with 7/3.5, and those fractions equal to each other.