Why do most student loans involve a co-signer? a. Most students won’t be able to afford paying for their loans, and leave that responsibility to their co-signers. b. Co-signers were most likely college students themselves and understand what it is like to be a college student. c. Most students aren’t responsible enough to know much about any type of loans, so a co-signer is there to make sure everything is secure. d. Most students are young enough not to have much of a credit score or credit history, so a second party such as a parent or guardian can establish security of payment.

d. Most students are young enough not to have much of a credit score or credit history, so a second party such as a parent or guardian can establish security of payment.

Step-by-step explanation:

A student loan can be defined as a governmental loan or loan sourced from a private lender in order to help a student pay his or her college or university expenses such as tuitions, books, living costs and supplies.

Also, a co-signer refers to an individual who agrees to apply for a loan with a student and as such is saddled with the responsibility of repaying the loan if the student cannot pay or defaults in the repayment of the loan.

This ultimately implies that, a co-signer is legally liable for the loan applied for by the student (borrower), if he or she cannot pay because the co-signer has been confirmed to have a good credit score and credit history.

Hence, the reason most student loans involve a co-signer is because most students are young enough not to have much of a credit score or credit history, so a second party such as a parent or guardian can establish security of payment.

7! = 7×6×5×4×3×2

3! = 3× 2

as 7! is multiple of 3! because 7! contains 3! that is 3× 2 as factor

so 7! /(3! ) = 7× 6× 5× 4

= 42 × 20

= 840

its b) 840✌✌✌

dhruv⭐

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: