HELP ME PLEASE ASAP Why do all historical accounts, even history books, include some form of subjectivity when they are supposed to be objective?

a.) because they are written by people who have certain biases, and these creep into their writing
B.) because writers of history books want to express their own thoughts about the events
C.) because readers need to understand how the people who lived through the event felt and thought
D.) because objective writing is boring and dry and readers need some subjectivity to connect to the facts

I think its B (let me know If I'm wrong)

It has been learned that subjectivity and objectivity in history are related to each other. The reason behind is that the objectivities are the historians and scientific researchers who are responsible for exploring ancient structures that reveal past historical stories that happened from the past.

Please consider marking brainliest! :)

if farmer matt works for 8 hours a day, how many days will it take him to completely plant 12 rows of crops? each batch of cookies needs 3/4 cups of sugar.

step-by-step explanation:

answer: the proof is mentioned below.

step-by-step explanation:

since, given:   lines bc = ef

prove:   lines ac > ef

          statements                                           reason

1. bc=ef                                           1. given

2. ac= ab+bc                                 2. because b is the point between the  

                                                            line segment ac

3.   ac > bc                                       3. because if a line segment is equal to

                                                          the sum of two line segments then it is

                                                          always greater then each of these

                                                          individual line segments

4. ac > ef                                         4. by equality property.