The coordinates of the vertices of △JKL are J(3, 0), K(1, −2), and L(6, −2). The coordinates of the vertices of △J′K′L′ are J′(−3, 1), K′(−1, 3), and L′(−6, 3). Which statement correctly describes the relationship between △JKL and △J′K′L′?

△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a translation 1 unit up followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.

△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 1 unit up, which is a sequence of rigid motions.

△JKL is congruent to △J′K′L′ because you can map △JKL to △J′K′L′ using a reflection across the x-axis followed by a reflection across the y-axis, which is a sequence of rigid motions.

△JKL is not congruent to △J′K′L′ because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △JKL to △J′K′L′.

b is the answer that makes most sense

step-by-step explanation:

{x = -1/2 ,   y = -1

step-by-step explanation:

solve the following system:

{2 x + y = -2

{10 x - 3 y = -2

in the first equation, look to solve for y:

{2 x + y = -2

{10 x - 3 y = -2

subtract 2 x from both sides:

{y = -2 x - 2

{10 x - 3 y = -2

substitute y = -2 x - 2 into the second equation:

{y = -2 x - 2

{10 x - 3 (-2 x - 2) = -2

10 x - 3 (-2 x - 2) = (6 x + 6) + 10 x = 16 x + 6:

{y = -2 x - 2

{16 x + 6 = -2

in the second equation, look to solve for x:

{y = -2 x - 2

{16 x + 6 = -2

subtract 6 from both sides:

{y = -2 x - 2

{16 x = -8

divide both sides by 16:

{y = -2 x - 2

{x = -1/2

substitute x = -1/2 into the first equation:

{y = -1

{x = -1/2

collect results in alphabetical order:

answer:   {x = -1/2 ,   y = -1

126 maybe. sorry

really really sorry if i'm

-12 -5(x + 4) = 3x

-12 - 5x - 20 = 3x

-12 - 20 - 5x = 3x

-32 - 5x = 3x

    + 5x   + 5x

-32 = 8x

8         8

- 4= x