Titus is asked to prove hexagon FEDCBA is congruent to hexagon F'E'D'C'B'A' in the graph below. Titus thinks that if he transforms hexagon
FEDCBA by (x, y) = (x + 16, y - 10) he can show the two figures are
congruent. Is he correct? Explain why or why not. If Titus is incorrect, what
series of transformations will correctly prove FEDCBA – FEDCBA?

Is Titus correct? YES
Explain why

(x, y) > ( - x , y - 10 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Titus is not correct.

There are two transformations will correctly prove FEDCBA ≅ F'E'D'C'B'A'

First transformation is Reflection over y-axis , then translation 10 units down.

The final formula is ( - x , y - 10 )

a. turk and mcalister

b. howard, mission, and market

c. yes. since streets end some do not cross yet are not parallel to others. example: mcalister and 5th

step-by-step explanation:

parallel lines are lines which do not intersect ever and look a lot like railroad tracks. turk, mcalister and golden gate are examples of these.

intersect are streets which cross each other and a car on one can reach the other. howard, mission, and market intersect with 6th.

skew lines are lines which neither intersect nor are parallel. these lines exist here because some streets end and never intersect another like mcalister and 5th.