You randomly select 16 restaurants and measure the temperature of the coffee sold at each. The sample mean temperature is 162 degrees with a standard deviation of 10 degrees. Assuming that the temperature is approximately normally distributed, a 95% confidence interval for the mean temperature is:

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Parks is wearing several rubber bracelets one third of the bracelets are tie dye 1/6 are blue and 1/3 of the remainder are camouflage if park swears to camouflage bracelets how many bracelets does he have on

Which of the following is the result of expanding