subject
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 17:20 Jalani15

12. Which reason justifies the statement below? "IF JK + LM = NP + LM, then JK = NP"

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
The graph below shows the price of different numbers of mats at a store: a graph is shown. the values on the x axis are 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10. the values on the y axis are 0, 21, 42, 63, 84, and 105. points are shown on ordered pairs 0, 0 and 2, 21 and 4, 42 and 6, 63 and 8, 84. these points are connected by a line. the label on the x axis is number of mats. the title on the y axis is price in dollars. which equation can be used to determine p, the cost of b mats?
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
What term makes it inconsistent y=2x - 4
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Asquare and an equilateral triangle have the same perimeter. each side the triangle is 4 inches longer than each side of the square. what is the perimeter of the square
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 02:30
An engineer is going to redesign an ejection seat for an airplane. the seat was designed for pilots weighing between 120 lb and 161 lb. the new population of pilots has normally distributed weights with a mean of 125 lb and a standard deviation of 28.1 lb. a)if a pilot is randomly selected, find the probability that his weight is between 120 lb and 161 lb.the probability is approximately? b. if 36 different pilots are randomly selected, find the probability that their mean weight is between 120 lb and 161 lb. the probability is approximately? c. when redesigning the ejection seat, which probability is more relevant? . part (b) because the seat performance for a single pilot is more important. b. part (b) because the seat performance for a sample of pilots is more important. c. part (a) because the seat performance for a sample of pilots is more important. d. part (a) because the seat performance for a single pilot is more important.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
12. Which reason justifies the statement below? "IF JK + LM = NP + LM, then JK = NP"...
Questions
question
English, 03.07.2019 22:00
question
Mathematics, 03.07.2019 22:00
question
Chemistry, 03.07.2019 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722363