Give the parent function and a description of the transformations, write the equation of the transformed function: f (x) = |x| vertical shift down 5, horizontal shift right 3, reflected across x-axis, and stretched vertically by 2

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

If a || b and e || f , what if the value of y ?

This is a rational expression because the denominator contains a variable. this is a polynomial with 3 terms. this is a rational expression because the denominator contains a variable. this is a polynomial with 4 terms. this is a rational expression because the denominator contains a variable. this is a polynomial with 4 terms. this is a rational expression because the denominator contains a variable. this is a polynomial with 3 terms. this is a rational expression because the denominator contains a variable. this is a polynomial with 5 terms.