The length of a rectangular wall is 16.5 feet. The height of the wall is 8.625 feet. Cameron determines the area of the wall to be 1423. 125 square feet. Which best explains the reasonableness of Cameron's solution?
O Cameron's solution is reasonable because there are four decimal places in the factors and four decimal places in
the product
Cameron's solution is reasonable because there are three decimal places in the factors and three decimal places
in the product
Cameron's solution is unreasonable because 17x9 is 153 and 153 is not close to his product.
Cameron's solution is unreasonable because 10x10 is 100, and 100 is not close to his product.
PLS HELP I WILL MARK U BRAINIEST

i did it myself and i got 4.2 (b) hope its right

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.

i have no