Researchers asked mothers how much soda (in ounces) their kids drank in a typical day. They also asked these mothers to rate how aggressive their kids were on a scale of 1 to 10, with larger values corresponding to a greater degree of aggression. The correlation between amount of soda consumed and aggression rating was found to be r = 0.1. If the researchers had measured amount of soda consumed in liters instead of ounces, what would be the correlation? (There are 35 ounces in a liter.)

h df tyjgtyj ttd y ytkgfty ty

step-by-step explanation:

tyty jry j y yj yttj yhgtyj y ghyj ytthj

step-by-step explanation:

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

this is the formula: v = the value of investment at the end of the time period

p = the principal amount (the initial amount invested)

r = the annual interest rate

n = the annual frequency of compounding (how many times a year interest is added)

t = the number of years the money is invested

^ means raise to the power of