When an experiment result seems to only partly support a hypothesis, a researcher should consider which of the following?a. Accounting for the research biasesb. Exploring alternation explanationc. Formulating scientific lawd. Manipulating data

b. Exploring alternation explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Experiments are carried out in controlled conditions to confirm a known truth, examine the validity of a hypothesis, or evaluate the efficacy of something that has never been tried before.

SO, when an experiment result seems only partly to support a hypothesis, the best thing to do is to consider exploring alternative explanations through modification of the hypothesis.

A scientific should not be formulated because it is when we have a valid theory that we can formulate a scientific law.

Also, we cannot manipulate the experiment's data because it is not part of the code and conduct of carrying out research.

y=−9/2x+10

step-by-step explanation:

let's solve for y.

0−9x−2y=−20

step 1: add 9x to both sides.

−9x−2y+9x=−20+9x

−2y=9x−20

step 2: divide both sides by -2.

−2y

−2

=

9x−20

−2

y=

−9

2

x+10

hi

step-by-step explanation: