A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage. If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted

there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that:

A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.

The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted

i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis

Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.

x=17

step-by-step explanation:

solve 3x-24=x+10

then that makes it 2x=34 because you subtract an x from both sides to get rid of the one on the right, and then you add 24 to both sides to get rid of the 24 on the left

divide by both sides by 2 to get your answer so that you can get your answer

b

step-by-step explanation:

the word superfluous means unnecessary