The historical mean for the final exam of a math course is 80, with a population standard deviation of 3. This year, a new teaching method is used to teach the same course, and the average final exam grade is 81. Based on this data, can we say that the new teaching method is better than the previous one (using an alpha level of .05)? Use the data in the GRADES spreadsheet to answer. Make sure you have the complete solution, from hypothesis formulation to reaching a conclusion. What is your conclusion?

step-by-step explanation:

well the answer to that is xoxoxo

step-by-step explanation:

if gloria has "carry over" minutes, (that is, any minutes paid for but not used in a month can be applied to her payment for minutes in the next month,) her total usage for the three months is: total minutes = 320 + 243 + 489 = 1052 minutes number of 200 minute blocks = 1052/200 = 5 r52 (that is 5 with a remainder of 52) rounding up the number of 200 minute blocks gives her usage for the three months as 6 blocks. the cost for six blocks is 6 x $25 = $150 she also has 200 - 52 or 148 carry over minutes if gloria pays each month and unused minutes are lost, applying the rounding up procedure to each month gives: first month usage of 320 minutes rounds up to 2 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 2 x $25 = $50 second month usage of 243 minutes rounds up to 2 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 2 x $25 = $50 third month usage of 489 minutes rounds up to 3 blocks of 200 minutes for a payment of 3 x $25 = $75 total payments for the three months are $50 + $50 + $75 = $175 get the plan with carry over minutes!