Question 5 Kate is finding the factors of a large number. Using
a calculator, she has just worked out that 66 is a
factor of this number.
Suddenly, she realises that 22 must be a factor of
the large number as well. Explain why Kate is
correct.

Explanation : If 66 is a factor of this unknown value, then 22 must be as well considering that 22 is a factor off 66. Let's say that this large value is 330. It is a multiple of 66, as 66 5 = 330. At the same time 22 15 = 330, so 330 is a multiple of 22 as well - or vice versa, 12 is a factor of 330.

We can also tell that 15, 22 fit into 330 through another approach. 22 3 = 66, and 66 5 = 330, so 5 3 = 15 - the same value. This proves that 22 will always be a factor of a value that is the factor of 66.

step-by-step explanation:

third choice down

step-by-step explanation:

the first inequality is based on the number of adults and campers, and the second inequality is based on the cost of feeding both the adult and the camper.

we know that there is room for 525 people max.   it's ok to have less than 525, but it's not ok to have more than 525, so the inequality is less than or equal to.   the number combination of adults (x) and campers (y) cannot exceed this 525 max.   therefore:

x + y ≤ 525

now we talk about cost.   it costs $9 to feed one adult, so depending upon the number of adults you have (x) depends upon how much it will cost to feed that number of adults.   same with the campers, who cost $5 to feed.   the adults can be represented by 9x and the campers can be represented by 5y.   since the budget cannot exceed 1,200, the second inequality is:

9x + 5y ≤ 1200