subject
Mathematics, 01.08.2020 03:01 imcool666

An article in the Journal of Aircraft (Vol. 23, 1986, pp. 859-864) described a new equivalent plate analysis method formulation that is capable of modeling aircraft structures such as cranked wing boxes and that produces results similar to the more computationally intensive finite element analysis method. Natural vibration frequencies for the cranked wing box structure are calculated using both methods, and results for the first seven natural frequencies follow: Frequency Finite Element Equivalent Plate
1 14.48 14.79
2 48.45 49.08
3 97.13 99.98
4 113.97 117.43
5 174.75 181.18
6 212.54 220.06
7 277.40 294.79
(a) Do the data suggest that the two methods provide the same mean value for natural vibration frequency? Use
α = 0.05.
(b) Find a 95% confidence interval on the mean difference between the two methods. Round your answers to three decimal places (e. g. 98.765).

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:00
The jones farm has 24 cows that each produce 52 quarts of milk a day. how many quarts are produced each day altogether
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
What is the equation of a vertical line passing through the point (−5, −1)? y = −5 y = −1 x = −5 x = −1
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
Name each raycalculation tip: in ray "ab", a is the endpoint of the ray.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
2. explain in words how you plot the point (4, −2) in a rectangular coordinate system.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
An article in the Journal of Aircraft (Vol. 23, 1986, pp. 859-864) described a new equivalent plate...
Questions
question
History, 06.02.2021 18:20
question
Mathematics, 06.02.2021 18:20
question
Health, 06.02.2021 18:20
question
Mathematics, 06.02.2021 18:20
Questions on the website: 13722359