Need Assistance With This
*Please Show Work*

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Match each statement with its corresponding value for the system below: y = -2(3)x and y = 9x - 2 1. the number of points of intersection. -2 2. the x-coordinate of the solution. 1 3. the y-coordinate of the solution. 0

Which is f(5) for the function –2x2 + 2x - 3?