Which shows a rational number plotted correctly on a number line? A number line going from negative 20 to negative 10 in increments of 2. There are 4 equal spaces between each number. Negative StartFraction 39 Over 2 EndFraction is plotted on the mark 1 space to the right of negative 20. A number line going from negative 10 to positive 4 in increments of 2. There are 4 equal spaces between each number. Negative 6.5 is plotted halfway between negative 6 and negative 4. A number line going from negative 6 to positive 2 in increments of 2. There are 4 equal spaces between each number. Negative one-half is plotted on the mark 1 space to the right of 0. A number line going from negative 5 to positive 3 in increments of 1. Negative 2.5 is plotted halfway between negative 2 and negative 1.

i leave the calculator work to you.

7. diameter 4 miles, circumference 4π miles

8. radius 0.2 miles, circumference 0.4π miles

[this is a bad problem because the actual radius of a car on the track is less than 0.2 miles so the answer is less than 0.4π miles]

9. radius 6 feet, circumference 12π feet

10. diameter 14 cm, circumference 14π cm

11. diameter 4.8 feet, circumference 4.8π feet

no association

step-by-step explanation:

if you have eyes and you can use them efficiently you can see that it just looks like random dots like do a line of best fit and like they're so spread out it's such a weak association you might as well consider it nonexistent

step-by-step explanation:

idk the answer i want to say 10 but then it would be equal so try 9 but then yeah so yeah we love edgen

f(x)=2/3x-8, which give g(x) the greatest value.

step-by-step explanation: