Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
The train station clock runs too fast and gains 5 minutes every 10 days. how many minutes and seconds will it have gained at the end of 9 days?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Daniel expanded the expression as shown below -2(-8x-4y+3/4)=-10x-8y-11/4 what errors did he make? check all that apply
Answers: 3
What number is 65% of 620?...
English, 11.12.2021 01:10
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 01:10
English, 11.12.2021 01:10
Social Studies, 11.12.2021 01:10
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 01:10
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 01:10
Advanced Placement (AP), 11.12.2021 01:10
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 01:10
Mathematics, 11.12.2021 01:10