Triangle ABC was transformed using the rule (x, y) → (–y, x). The vertices of the triangles are shown. A (–1, 1) B (1, 1) C (1, 4) A' (–1, –1) B' (–1, 1) C' (–4, 1) Which best describes the transformation? The transformation was a 90° rotation about the origin. The transformation was a 180° rotation about the origin. The transformation was a 270° rotation about the origin. The transformation was a 360° rotation about the origin.

The best option that describes the transformation (x, y) → (–y, x) is;

Option A; The transformation was a 90° rotation about the origin

We are given the transformation rule used as; (x, y) → (–y, x)

A (–1, 1) → A' (–1, –1)

B (1, 1) → B' (–1, 1)

C (1, 4) → C' (–4, 1)

Read more at; link

the transformation was 90° at the origin

Step-by-step explanation:

the transformation was 90° at the origin

i don't think there is enough

part a: triangles gcb and epb

part b. sides cg and rp are parallel by definition of parallelogram.

angles cgb and e are congruent by being alternate interior angles of parallel lines cut by a transversal. angles gbc and ebp are congruent because they are vertical angles. by aa similarity, the triangles are similar.

part c. since the triangles are similar, the ratios of the lengths of corresponding sides are equal.

calculation of be:

gb/be = cb/bp

(400 ft)/be = 300/200

(400 ft)/be = 3/2

3be = 2 * 400 ft

3be = 800 ft

be = 800/3 ft

calculation of pe:

gc/pe = cb/bp

(350 ft)/pe = 300/200

(350 ft)/pe = 3/2

3pe = 2 * 350 ft

3pe = 700 ft

pe = 700/3 ft