Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain. Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet(s). No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners. Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s). No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).p

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners.

Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

According to nypost, they spend an average of $2000+ a year on their pets. So 3 owners either spending $720 on their pets each or combined is unrealistic. If this is wrong, it's because I have no idea what the function is.

- "runner b is moving at a slower rate."

- "the graphs shown are graphs of distance(km) against time(min).

the slopes of this graphs are are given by:

slope = (change in y)/(change in x)

= (change in distance)/(change in time)

this is the formula for finding the speed. so, the slope of these graphs represent the speed of the runner.

taking each division in the graph to represent 1 on both axis:

runner a ⇒ speed = (2-0)/(1-0)

= 2/1

= 2 km/min

runner b ⇒ speed = (3-0)/(3-0)

= 3/3

= 1 km/min

this shows that   runner b is moving at a slower rate."