When planning a more strenuous hike, Nadine figures that she will need at least 0.6 liters of water for each hour on the trail. She also plans to always have at least 1.25 liters of water as a general reserve. If x represents the duration of the hike (in hours) and y represents the amount of water needed (in liters) for a hike, the following inequality describes this relation: y greater or equal than 0.6 x plus 1.25 Which of the following would be a solution to this situation?

Having 3.2 liters of water for 3 hours of hiking

Step-by-step explanation:

If x represents the number of hours and y represents the number of liters of water, then we can plug the possible solutions into our inequality to see which solution(s) work.

The first option is having 3 liters of water for 3.5 hours of hiking. We will plug 3 in for y and 3.5 in for x:

y > 0.6x + 1.25

3 > 0.6(3.5) + 1.25

3 > 3.35

But since 3 is not greater than 3.35, this does not work.

The next option is having 2 liters of water for 2.5 hours of hiking:

2 > 0.6(2.5) + 1.25

2 > 2.75

But 2 is not greater than 2.75, so this does not work.

Option c is having 2.3 liters of water for 2 hours of hiking:

2.3 > 0.6(2) + 1.25

2.3 > 2.45

Since 2.3 is not greater than 2.45, this solution does not work.

The last option is having 3.2 liters of water for 3 hours of hiking:

3.2 > 0.6(3) + 1.25

3.2 > 3.05

3.2 IS greater than 3.05, so this solution works!

answer: no, but if it does it's a obvious pattern.

step-by-step explanation: