Mathematics, 20.06.2020 22:57 joneil1952
The relation defined by the set of ordered pairs below is not a function. Which ordered
pair could be removed to obtain a function?
{(-5,0),(3,0), (7,6), (6,7),(3,4),(2, 2)}
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
Divide reduce the answer to lowest term 3/7 divided 1 1/6
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 05:30
The john deere company has found that revenue,in dollars, from sales of heavy-duty tractors is a function of the unit price p, in dollars, that it charges. if therevenue r is r(p)= -1/2p^2 +1900pa)how much revenue will the company generate if they sell 700 tractors? b) how many tractors does the company want to sell to maximize the revenue?
Answers: 1
The relation defined by the set of ordered pairs below is not a function. Which ordered
pair could...
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 08:01
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
Geography, 16.10.2020 08:01
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 08:01
English, 16.10.2020 08:01
History, 16.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 08:01
Engineering, 16.10.2020 08:01