The function f is defined by f(x)=3x+2.
Find f(a-4).

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Plz heeeeeeelp plz give me the answer

What are the related frequencies to the nearest hundredth of the columns of the two way table? group 1: a-102 b-34group 2: a-18 b-14edited: i don’t have all day to be waiting for an answer. i figured it out.