Color Blindness in Men and Women The most common form of color blindness is an inability to distinguish red from green. However, this particular form of color blindness is much more common in men than in women (this is because the genes corresponding to the red and green receptors are located on the X-chromosome). Approximately of American men and of American women are red-green color-blind.1 Let and denote the events that a man or a woman is color-blind, respectively. A) If an Americal male is selected at random, what is the probability that he is red-green color-blind?
B) If an American female is selected at random, what is the probability that she is not red-green color-blind?
C) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that neither are red-green color-blind?D) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that at least one of them is red-green color-blind?

A. Probability the man is colorblind = 0.07

B. Probability the woman is not colorblind = 0.996

C. Probability neither the man or woman is colorblind = 0.926

D. Probability at least one of the woman or man is colorblind = 0.074

Note: The given question is missing some values. The question below is a sample question.

"The most common form of color blindness is an inability to distinguish red from green. However, this particular form of color blindness is much more common in men than in women (this is because the genes corresponding to the red and green receptors are located on the X-chromosomes). Approximately 7% of American men and 0.4% of American women are red-green color-blind.

(a) If an American male is selected at random, what is the probability that he is red-green colorblind?

(b) If an American female is selected at random, what is the probability that she is NOT red-green color-blind?

(c) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that neither are

red-green color-blind?

(d) If one man and one woman are selected at random, what is the probability that at least one of them is red-green color-blind?"

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Let cbM and cbW represent the events that a man or a woman is colorblind, respectively.

(a) 7% of men are colorblind, P(CBM) = 7/100 = 0.07.

(b) 0.4% of women are colorblind = 0.4/100 = 0.004

P(not cbW) = 1 - P(cbW)

P(not cbW) = 1 - 0.004 = 0.996.

(c) Probability the woman is not colorblind, P(not cbW) = 0.996,

Probability that the man is not color- blind, P(not cbM) = 1 - 0.07 = 0.93.

The two events are independent of each other, therefore, their probabilities are multiplied together:

P(neither is colorblind) = P(not cbM) × P(not cbW)

= 0.93 × 0.996 = 0.926.

(d) Probability that at least one is colorblind is the complement of the set P (neither is colorblind).

Therefore, P(at least one is colorblind) = 1 - P (Neither is Colorblind)

= 1 - 0.926 = 0.074

when functions are first introduced, you will probably have some simplistic "functions" and relations to deal with, usually being just sets of points. these won't be terribly useful or interesting functions and relations, but your text wants you to get the idea of what the domain and range of a function are. small sets of points are generally the simplest sorts of relations, so your book starts with those.

step-by-step explanation:

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(2, –3), (4, 6), (3, –1), (6, 6), (2, 3)}

the above list of points, being a relationship between certain x's and certain y's, is a relation. the domain is all the x-values, and the range is all the y-values. to give the domain and the range, i just list the values without duplication:

domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

(it is customary to list these values in numerical order, but it is not required. sets are called "unordered lists", so you can list the numbers in any order you feel like. just don't duplicate: technically, repetitions are okay in sets, but most instructors would count off for this.)

while the given set does indeed represent a relation (because x's and y's are being related to each other), the set they gave me contains two points with the same x-value: (2, –3) and (2, 3). since x = 2 gives me two possible destinations (that is, two possible y-values), then this relation is not a function.

note that all i had to do to check whether the relation was a function was to look for duplicate x-values. if you find any duplicate x-values, then the different y-values mean that you do not have a function. remember: for a relation to be a function, each x-value has to go to one, and only one, y-value.

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(–3, 5), (–2, 5), (–1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

i'll just list the x-values for the domain and the y-values for the range:

on monday rodney ate 1/4th of the sandwich = 3/12

on tuesday he ate 1/3rd of the sandwich = 4/12

therefore in total he has eaten = 3/12 + 4/12 = 7/12

thus we can say that he has eaten 7/12 of the sandwich on monday and tuesday alltogether.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest.