، باط
Mason says that 350 + 2 x 104 can be written in scientific notation as 55 x 104 Is Mason correct?
Explain your answer using mathematics,

Mason's affirmation is:

Step-by-step explanation:

The first form you can see that Mason is wrong is operating:

How the two operations didn't have the same result, the second form isn't a scientific notation of the first form.

The second case is because a scientific notation regularly is written in the next form:

I used the result (558) then ubicate the point in the units (5) and the rest  are decimals, next I used 10 and the number of digits that I moved the point (2).

the answer is b; false. 2 dimensional things are a lot more different from 3 dimensional things.

i hope this ! : d

"stay and stay proud! " - zalgo

$450

step-by-step explanation:

first, you have to multiply 150x2=300

next, you have to add 150+300= 450