What does negative 2 over 3 > −1 indicate about the positions of negative 2 over 3 and −1 on the number line?

negative 2 over 3 is located to the right of −1
negative 2 over 3 is located on the left of −1
negative 2 over 3 is located on the right of 0, and −1 is located on the left of 0
negative 2 over 3 is located on the left of 0, and −1 is located on the right of 0. Btw any of yall flvs students?

it tells you -2/3 is closer ro zero on the number line or just farther to the right

Step-by-step explanation:

It's easy to MULTIPLY signed numbers; you just look at the signs, and if they are the same (+ times + or - times -), the product is positive, while if they are different it is negative. But addition and subtraction don't work that way. You have to know the actual values in order to know the sign. In particular, the difference between two negative numbers can be either positive or negative, or even zero if they are the same. Let's start with addition. If you add two positive numbers, the sum will be positive: the first number puts you at some point to the right of zero on the number line, and adding a positive number moves you farther to the right. -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--> |>|>| 2 + 3 =5 Since you are always going to the right, the sum has to be positive. If you add two negative numbers, you are always moving to the left, since adding a negative number takes you to the left: -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--> |<|<| -3 + -2 -2 + -3 = -5 But if the signs are different, you are going both left and right, and the sign of the answer depends on which is "bigger." It's sort of a tug-of-war; the stronger number wins. Let's add 2 + -3: -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--> |>| 2 |<| + -3 -1 Here I first went 2 units to the right, and then I went 3 units to the left. It took 2 units to get me to 0, and that left one more unit to the left, taking me to -1. Because 3 is bigger than 2, -3 "won" over +2, and made the answer negative. The size of the sum is the difference between the sizes of the two numbers. The opposite thing happens if the first number is greater. Let's do -3 + 2: -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 <--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--> |<| -3 |>| + 2 -1 Here, I went 3 units to the left, and adding 2 didn't take me far enough to get back to zero, so the answer is negative. Its size again is the difference between the sizes of the numbers. Now, notice that what we've been doing is the same as subtraction. Moving some amount to the left can be seen either as adding a negative number, or subtracting a positive number. And moving to the right can be thought of either as adding a positive number, or (and this is the one that might seem odd) as subtracting a negative number. That's because subtraction asks the question, what do we have to add to the second number to get the first? For example, when we say 3 - 2 = 1 that's because 3 = 2 + 1 That is, 1 is the amount we have to add to 2 to get 3. So what is 2 - -3? Well, 2 - -3 = 5 because 2 = -3 + 5 So as I said, subtracting a negative moves us to the right. We can find the answer by changing the subtraction to an addition: 2 - -3 = 2 + 3 = 5 On the other hand, -2 - -3 = -2 + 3 = 3 + -2 = 3 - 2 = 1 since after we change the addition to subtraction, the 3 takes us farther to the right than the -2 took us to the left. Notice that I did this without having to draw a number line; I just changed the problem by changing the order so the 3 comes before the -2, and then turning it back into a subtraction. You should now be able to do any of your problems, even the one with fractions. But you should be aware that those are not integers. Because you have been introduced to signs as part of learning about integers, you may think that "integer" means "signed number"; but actually it means "whole numbers with signs." A signed fraction is a rational number.

Step-by-step explanation:

answer:

step-by-step explanation:

here, the total dishes = 10

dishes having meat = 3 ( chicken, meatloaf and hamburger )

thus, the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes = number of dishes having meat / total dishes

=

therefore, the probability of not having meat = 1- the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes

=

=

=

⇒ option b is correct.