Which statement best illustrates using the vertical line test to determine if the graph below is a function of x?
-5
+
-3 -2 -11
1
2
3
4
TTT
The graph is not a function of x because the line x = 0 intersects the graph at two points.
The graph is a function of x because the line x = 5 does not intersect the graph
The graph is not a function of x because the line y = 0 intersects the graph at two points
The graph is a function of x because the hne y = 5 does not intersect the graph

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.

x > 4

step-by-step explanation:

solve for   x by simplifying both sides of the equation, then isolating the variable.