subject
Mathematics, 07.05.2020 01:11 caguil00

^ Casey was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a translation and a rotation.

Casey concluded:

"I was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a sequence of rigid transformations without a dilation, so the figures are congruent but they are not similar."

What error did casey make in her conclusion?

A. The correct conclusion is that the segments are congruent and similar.
B. The correct conclusion is that the segments are neither congruent, nor similar.
C. There is no error. This is a correct conclusion

Which one is it please?


^ Casey was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a translation and a rotation. Cas

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
Triangle inequality theorem state if each set of three numbers can be the lengths of the sides of a triangle. 1. 9, 8, 22. 2. 5,10,12. 3. 7,10,22. 4. 4,11,12. 5. 11,9,10. 6. 10,4,19. 7. 3,12,10. 8. 4,3,2. 9. 6,5,13. 10. 7,12,20. me .
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which of the following is true for the relation f(x)=2x^2+1
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
Fast! find the length of cu. the triangles are similar. show your work.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 04:00
Grace paid $1.70 for 5 ounces of candy. how much did she pay for 24 ounces?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
^ Casey was able to map line segment UV onto line segment ST using a translation and a rotation.
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 17:30
question
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 17:30
question
Biology, 18.11.2020 17:30
Questions on the website: 13722367