subject
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 21:33 memester74

Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function f(x) = 2x. She makes these two statements:

1. As x increases infinitely, the y-values are continually doubled for each single increase in x.
2. As x decreases infinitely, the y-values are continually halved for each single decrease in x.

She concludes that there are no limits within the set of real numbers on the range of this exponential function. Which best explains the accuracy of Geraldineā€™s statements and her conclusion?

Statement 1 is incorrect because the y-values are increased by 2, not doubled.
Statement 2 is incorrect because the y-values are doubled, not halved.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of integers.
The conclusion is incorrect because the range is limited to the set of positive real numbers.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
An equation where variables are used to represent known valuesā€”function notation true or false
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
What is the x-intercept and y-intercept of the equation 2x+1. 2o
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Ahypothesis is: a the average squared deviations about the mean of a distribution of values b) an empirically testable statement that is an unproven supposition developed in order to explain phenomena a statement that asserts the status quo; that is, any change from what has been c) thought to be true is due to random sampling order da statement that is the opposite of the null hypothesis e) the error made by rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
In a test for esp (extrasensory perception), the experimenter looks at cards that are hidden from the subject. each card contains either a star, a circle, a wave, a cross or a square.(five shapes) as the experimenter looks at each of 20 cards in turn, the subject names the shape on the card. when the esp study described above discovers a subject whose performance appears to be better than guessing, the study continues at greater length. the experimenter looks at many cards bearing one of five shapes (star, square, circle, wave, and cross) in an order determined by random numbers. the subject cannot see the experimenter as he looks at each card in turn, in order to avoid any possible nonverbal clues. the answers of a subject who does not have esp should be independent observations, each with probability 1/5 of success. we record 1000 attempts. which of the following assumptions must be met in order to solve this problem? it's reasonable to assume normality 0.8(1000), 0.2(1000)%30 approximately normal 0.8(1000), 0.2(1000)% 10 approximately normal srs it is reasonable to assume the total number of cards is over 10,000 it is reasonable to assume the total number of cards is over 1000
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Geraldine is asked to explain the limits on the range of an exponential equation using the function...
Questions
question
English, 08.12.2021 18:50
Questions on the website: 13722361